Nicholas Anelka is a confused man
January 25th, 2025by Robert O’Connor
Nicholas Anelka has ruffled more than his fair share of feathers in seventeen years as a professional. His latest injudicious wobble – the use of the ant-Semitic Quenelle to mark his goal against West Ham on Boxing Day – has found its way under the skin of more offended parties than the divisive Frenchman usually typically Anelka's personal indiscretions have offended only club loyalties –at Arsenal when he recklessly claimed he would sooner repair TV's for a living than turn out again at Highbury, or the recent spell in China which ended amidst half-baked complaints of feeling 'under-valued'.
It would take a poor judge of character to place social responsibility high on the list of the journeyman's priorities, since personal fidelity has so eluded his chequered career to date. At Upton Park and in its aftermath those who still care enough to pay mind to Anelka took the full force of this particular brand of crass idiosyncrasy in the face.
And now the material costs of Anelka's actions are brought to bear on his club. They may fall soon on the player's shoulders too, with the FA's decision on a suitable punishment imminent. Shirt sponsors Zoopla, co-owned by Jewish businessman Alex Chesterman, have already announced they won't be renewing their association with West Brom beyond the end of the current deal which expires this summer, and for the first time in the long-narrative of high-profile racially-tinted controversies that have peppered the domestic game over the last 24 months the bill for the damage is being counted in monetary rather than simply moralistic terms. Sadly, but self-evidently, it seems to be the only way to get key figures in the game excited.
Gary Neville was in typically vitriolic voice on Monday over what he considers to be a hysterical over-reaction by the property-search service in severing its ties with the club on didactic grounds. But then Sky Sports' latest vox-pox machine has long since been the flag-bearer for gristle-headed conservatism in cultural soccer analysis, reluctant to allow that any decision may be taken within the four walls of football predicated on anything other than the two-dimensional facts of what happens on the pitch. As though football, defined as it is by the ubiquitous presence of brands, imagery and iconography, should somehow be able to wear the badges of stomach-turning neo-fascist symbolism without taking a blow to its integrity.
But integrity is spread across modern professional football only thinly. The more millions that pour into the game the more we seem to be shouted down by apologists for infantile, pig-headed show-boating, as though a century of civic progress is to be sold out for a big-money sponsorship deal here, a 20-goal-a-season striker
Related Posts
West Ham United v Chelsea – Match Preview and Betting Tips
Stick or twist? West Ham's dangerous managerial decision
Inter Decline Exemplified by Carew Signing- Ravel Morrison leaves West Ham after club terminate contract
- Ravel Morrison must prove he wants to play for West Ham, says Sam Allardyce
- West Ham have power of veto on Tottenham Olympic Stadium groundshare